Fourteen capability domains Pre seed research and development Clinician directed

Capabilities

Research grade
developments,
product use cases.

I.

Why governance comes first

Adaptive systems need external constraint.

A clinical model that learns in deployment changes the system it was validated in. The firm's research program treats governance as a viability constraint on adaptive computation rather than a compliance layer added after the fact. Every capability below is built to that premise: generation separated from evaluation, thresholds declared at named stages, and an audit trail that survives the model that produced it.

Premise 01

Failures are structural

Clinically consequential AI failures arise from interactions among workflows, documentation practices, incentives, and accountability, not from isolated algorithmic defects. Peer reviewed in Am J Biomed Sci & Res (2026).

Premise 02

Validation can be evaded

Shortcut learning and misclassification pass standard validation undetected. Audited in JAMIA Open (Oxford University Press, 2026), Harvard GCSRT capstone.

Premise 03

Governance is formalisable

Externally Governed Learning Systems (EGLS) gives adaptive computation a formal viability constraint. Foundation of US Provisional Patent 63/975,551 and the AIDD-GOV open standard.

II.

AI competency map

Eight domains, one framework.

Each capability is exercised inside at least one portfolio platform. Maturity is stated as observed, not as intended. Evidence links resolve to public preprints, peer reviewed articles, patent filings, or public repositories.

#Capability domainProduct instantiationEvidence on recordMaturity
01Governed AI architecture and strategyFxMED OS governance ledger · DrugSynthAI stage gatesEGLS, SSRN 6160268 · Patent 63/975,551Production, internal
02Multi agent clinical AI systemsDrugSynthAI · MedClaw runtime67 agents, 5 tiers, 536 tests · Patent 64/018,624Production, internal
03Predictive modeling and validation auditFHIR native governance · bandit model selectionJAMIA Open ooaf177 · Research Square rs.3.rs-8714776Peer reviewed
04Imaging and multi omics analyticsGenomic subtyping audit · mitochondrial variant modelingJAMIA Open · MitoCoreX Zenodo 19393450Research
05Clinical NLP and document intelligenceFxMED OS AI scribe · literature surveillance pipelinesFxMED OS service layers · methods publishedProduction, internal
06Retrieval grounded generationMedBoardPRO Analyst, Strategist, Judge · citation verified education enginePatent 64/012,574 · Trademark 99721498Beta
07MLOps, evaluation gates, deployment governanceDrugSynthAI build discipline · AIDD-GOV103 numbered rules · 18 stage gates · Apache 2.0 standardOperational, open
08Companion and conversational AIFxMED Advisor inside FxMED OSSecond EGLS instantiation, in developmentPhase 1
III.

Capability domains

Research question, use case, evidence.

Each domain follows the same contract: the question the firm is investigating, the product context in which the capability is exercised, and what has been placed on public record.

01 · Governed AI architecture and strategy Architecture · Governance · Viability

How should decision authority and learning authority be separated in a clinical system?

Use case. Architectural core of FxMED OS and DrugSynthAI. Governance declarations name every agent's authority boundary; a ledger (SOGDR) records each release decision; the Watcher Protocol audits runtime behaviour against the declaration.

  • Externally Governed Learning Systems: formal model, SSRN 6160268, US Provisional Patent 63/975,551
  • Feasibility and data readiness assessment expressed as enumerated failure modes before any build
  • Compliance as a Service model for auditable genomic AI, SSRN 6159546
02 · Multi agent clinical AI systems Pipelines · Validators · Orchestrators

Can a critic actor architecture hold quality thresholds across a long discovery pipeline?

Use case. DrugSynthAI: sixty seven autonomous agents across five tiers (pipeline, validators, orchestrators, intelligence, precision medicine), 167 API endpoints, 536 passing tests including 37 security focused. MedClaw provides the local first orchestration runtime with cost aware model routing, Ollama primary inference, and cloud fallback.

  • Generation agents separated from evaluative agents by contract; bounded retry policies at named gates
  • Per agent telemetry logged to a governance database for regression detection and post hoc review
  • US Provisional Patent 64/018,624 with three amendments; three complete discovery campaigns
03 · Predictive modeling and validation audit Classification · Prediction · Audit

Which model failures survive standard validation, and how are they detected in deployment?

Use case. Adaptive model selection via multi armed bandits inside HL7 FHIR native governance infrastructure. Empirical audit of shortcut learning in AI based genomic subtyping, peer reviewed in JAMIA Open, Vol. 9, Issue 2 (DOI 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf177).

  • Adaptive FHIR native AI governance for clinical decision support, Research Square (DOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-8714776/v1) with Zenodo dataset
  • Cardiometabolic risk modeling research line in cardio endocrinology
  • Declared inclusion rules and temporal weighting for rolling evidence synthesis
04 · Imaging and multi omics analytics Genomics · Proteomics · Structure

How do structure, variant, and pathway data constrain precision design for rare disease?

Use case. MitoCoreX, the first validated DrugSynthAI campaign: systems level mitochondrial pathway connectivity mapping, druggability assessment of structure function constraints, and variant modeling for functional defect classification. Published on Zenodo (DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19393450), ChemRxiv, and Research Square.

  • De novo design against five priority mitochondrial proteins; pan mitochondrial scaffolds identified
  • In silico ADMET, target engagement, selectivity, and stability profiling
  • Exploratory research lines in amyloid PET imaging and proteomic signatures; not yet instantiated in a platform
05 · Clinical NLP and document intelligence Encounters · Documents · Literature

Can documentation and evidence workflows be made auditable end to end?

Use case. The FxMED OS AI scribe operates inside the encounter, clinical document, and consent layers under business associate agreement governance. Research infrastructure pipelines ingest, screen, and synthesise biomedical literature across PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and preprint servers on a continuous schedule.

  • Structured outputs suitable for systematic review registration and PRISMA reporting
  • Preprint triage and literature surveillance with declared inclusion rules
  • Editorial workflow instrumentation informed by seventy verified peer reviews across PLOS, Oxford, Clarivate, Elsevier, and Springer Nature
06 · Retrieval grounded generation LLMs · Retrieval · Verification

What contract keeps generated medical content evidentially and structurally sound?

Use case. MedBoardPRO's three tier Analyst, Strategist, Judge architecture under EGLS governance (US Provisional Patent 64/012,574, 27 claim specification; USPTO Trademark Serial 99721498). A citation verified education engine resolves every reference through Crossref before a module is accepted and rejects degraded identifier metadata.

  • Generation, evaluation, and judgement as separate agents with declared thresholds
  • Bilingual mirror generation with geometric and evidential parity checks
  • Model access across Anthropic, OpenAI, and local inference through Ollama, routed by cost and sensitivity
07 · MLOps, evaluation gates, deployment governance Versioning · Gates · Kill switch

Which deploy time guards prevent silent failure in a model or content release?

Use case. DrugSynthAI build discipline under 103 numbered rules (R01 to R103). Three campaigns, 163 candidates ranked per campaign, 18 stage gate decisions, all passed, zero kill switch activations. The AIDD-GOV governance standard (v0.1, Apache 2.0, 10 formal schemas, 3 conformance levels) publishes the pattern for reuse.

  • Reproducible environments and deployment scripts; telemetry at every gate
  • Silent failure guards: completeness assertions, parity checks, and deploy content gating
  • Public GitHub repository for the open standard
08 · Companion and conversational AI Operator specific · Embedded · Governed

What distinguishes a clinician trained companion from a generic documentation scribe?

Use case. FxMED Advisor, the second production instantiation of externally governed learning systems, embedded inside FxMED OS as an operator specific AI layer. Phase 1, in development.

  • Context bound to the operating physician's own workflow and documentation practice
  • Same governance ledger and audit path as the host operating system
  • No autonomous clinical decision authority by design
IV.

Platform engineering

Six domains beyond the model.

Governed AI is only useful inside a system that clinicians, learners, and researchers can operate. The firm builds that system layer itself: electronic health record infrastructure, learning platforms, cloud native delivery, and the data engineering underneath. Each domain is stated with the platform that exercises it and its observed maturity.

#Platform domainProduct instantiationEvidence on recordMaturity
09Digital transformation for clinical organizationsFxMED OS · guided setup, onboarding, white label, tenancy19 service layers in productionProduction, internal
10Electronic health record and physician operating systemsFxMED OS registry, scheduling, encounters, documents, consentHL7 FHIR native · BAA governance · Patent 63/975,551Production, internal
11Educational and learning platformsMedBoardPRO · AFMI Platform · bilingual course enginePatent 64/012,574 · Trademark 99721498 · 104 gated modulesBeta / MVP
12Healthtech product engineeringPatient portal, communications, membership, CRM layersFxMED OS service layers · FxMED AdvisorProduction, internal
13Cloud native delivery and DevOpsVercel, Supabase, Docker, git integrated deploys; MedClaw local first runtimeDeploy content gates · 536 tests · reproducible environmentsOperational
14Data engineering and research analyticsGovernance telemetry database · literature pipelines · open datasetsZenodo and Harvard Dataverse releases · CC BY 4.0Operational
09 · Digital transformation for clinical organizations Tenancy · Onboarding · White label

How does a practice move from paper and point tools to a governed operating system without losing its workflow?

Use case. FxMED OS ships guided setup, tenant scoped onboarding, white label configuration, entitlements, and task workflow as first class service layers, so that a clinic's existing process is encoded rather than replaced. Multi tenant architecture with tenant scoped access control.

  • Standard API integration with existing CRM, EHR, and laboratory systems
  • Role based access control and audit friendly logging at every integration point
  • Physician review as a named stage in every release, not a sign off after the fact
10 · Electronic health record and physician operating systems Registry · Encounters · Consent

What does an EHR look like when governance is in the architecture rather than in the policy binder?

Use case. FxMED OS, the firm's Intelligent Physician Operating System, runs nineteen service layers in production: patient registry, scheduling, queue flow, encounter management, clinical documents, consent and permissions, attachments and media, portal policy, communications, AI scribe, tenancy, task workflow, entitlements, search, onboarding, white label, proxy access, membership, CRM, and guided setup. Architectural core covered by EGLS Patent 63/975,551.

  • HL7 FHIR native governance infrastructure; interoperable by design
  • ES256 JWT authentication with legacy HS256 fallback; governance ledger (SOGDR); Watcher Protocol audit
  • Protected health information handled only under an executed business associate agreement
11 · Educational and learning platforms Adaptive · Multi tenant · Verified

Can a learning platform adapt to the learner while every item it teaches stays evidentially verified?

Use case. MedBoardPRO, an adaptive licensure preparation engine for USMLE and related boards, runs a three tier Analyst, Strategist, Judge architecture under EGLS governance (US Provisional Patent 64/012,574; USPTO Trademark Serial 99721498). The AFMI Platform is a physician first educational SaaS on Next.js and FastAPI with Clerk authentication, Supabase, and multi tenant billing. A bilingual course engine produced 104 gated continuing education modules in functional medicine and endocrinology, every citation resolved through Crossref.

  • Adaptive sequencing with declared thresholds; generation and judgement separated by agent
  • Tenant scoped content, entitlements, and progress; portal and storefront scaffolds
  • Bilingual mirror generation with geometric and evidential parity checks
12 · Healthtech product engineering Portal · Communications · Membership

Which patient facing surfaces can sit on top of a governed clinical core without leaking authority?

Use case. Patient portal policy, communications, notification and reminder workflows tuned to adherence objectives, proxy access, membership, and CRM run as FxMED OS service layers over the same governance ledger. FxMED Advisor, in development, extends the same core with an operator specific companion layer.

  • Patient facing applications and physician operating systems on one tenancy model
  • No autonomous clinical decision authority in any patient facing surface by design
  • Custom software delivered as code with governance declarations and operational runbooks
13 · Cloud native delivery and DevOps Git integrated · Gated · Local first

How is a release made reproducible and reversible when models and content change together?

Use case. Git integrated production deploys on Vercel with Supabase and PostgreSQL as the data layer, Docker for reproducible environments, and deploy content gates that block any release carrying a gated artifact. The MedClaw runtime keeps inference local first through Ollama with cost aware cloud fallback, so the same pipeline runs on a workstation or in the cloud.

  • Stage gates, kill switch protocols, and completeness assertions before merge
  • Reproducible environment and deployment scripts handed over with every platform
  • Security focused test suites (37 of 536 in DrugSynthAI) and header hardening on every public surface
14 · Data engineering and research analytics Telemetry · Pipelines · Open data

What data infrastructure lets an AI failure be reconstructed after the fact?

Use case. Per agent telemetry is logged to a governance database for regression detection and post hoc review. Literature pipelines ingest, screen, and synthesise biomedical evidence on a continuous schedule with declared inclusion rules and temporal weighting. Research data is released on Zenodo and Harvard Dataverse under CC BY 4.0.

  • Structured outputs for dashboards, editorial workflows, grant preparation, and systematic review submission
  • Dataset accompanying the FHIR native governance preprint (Research Square, Zenodo)
  • Candidate ranking analytics across three discovery campaigns, 163 candidates each
V.

Showcase cases

Three platforms, end to end.

Each case is a research instantiation built and operated by the firm. Problem, approach, and what is on record; no outcomes are claimed beyond what has been published or filed.

Case 01 · EHR

FxMED OS: a physician operating system with governance in the core

Problem. Clinical software accumulates AI features faster than it accumulates accountability. Approach. Nineteen service layers on one tenancy model, HL7 FHIR native, with a governance ledger and runtime watcher derived from the EGLS framework. On record. Production, internal; EGLS Patent 63/975,551; BAA governed deployment posture.

FxMED OS →

Case 02 · Education

MedBoardPRO and AFMI: adaptive learning under evidential control

Problem. Adaptive tutors optimise for engagement and drift from the evidence. Approach. Analyst, Strategist, Judge tiers with declared thresholds; a multi tenant physician first SaaS; a bilingual course engine that rejects any unverifiable citation. On record. Beta and MVP; Patent 64/012,574; Trademark 99721498; 104 gated modules.

medboard.pro →

Case 03 · Discovery

DrugSynthAI and MitoCoreX: a governed discovery campaign

Problem. Rare genetic disease is deprioritised by conventional pipelines. Approach. Sixty seven agents across five tiers, 103 build rules, stage gates with kill switch. On record. Three campaigns, 163 candidates ranked each, 18 gate decisions passed; Zenodo 10.5281/zenodo.19393450; Patent 64/018,624; AIDD-GOV open standard.

drugsynth.ai →

Development methodology

Five stages,
each with a declared
failure mode.

Nothing is built without an explicit success criterion and a named way it can fail. The same sequence governs a drug discovery campaign, a physician operating system release, and a licensure preparation model.

Stage 01

Discovery and failure mode enumeration

Research question, data provenance, clinical and regulatory constraints, and the enumerated ways the system can fail, written before architecture.

Stage 02

Architecture and governance declaration

Agent responsibilities, authority boundaries, thresholds, and key performance indicators declared in a governance document that the build is tested against.

Stage 03

Data engineering and verification

Every external identifier resolved at source. Degraded metadata rejected. Training and evaluation sets separated by contract.

Stage 04

Governed deployment and integration

Release through stage gates with kill switch protocols. Integration through standard APIs and HL7 FHIR where clinical data is in scope.

Stage 05

Monitoring, audit, and retraining

Runtime behaviour audited against the declaration. Regression detected from per agent telemetry. Retraining is itself a gated release.

VI.

Domains of study

Where the capability is exercised.

The firm's research is concentrated where a practicing endocrinologist and clinician scientist can direct, audit, and clinically review the output. Domains are listed by the platform or program in which they are active.

DomainProgram or platformRepresentative output
Drug discovery for rare genetic diseaseDrugSynthAI · MitoCoreXValidated campaign, Zenodo 19393450; ChemRxiv preprint; AIMed 2026 Krakow poster
Clinical operations and physician workflowFxMED OSNineteen service layers in production under BAA governance
Medical education and licensureMedBoardPRO · AFMI PlatformAdaptive preparation engine, beta; educational SaaS, MVP
Genomics and precision medicineValidation audit programJAMIA Open 2026; Auditable AI for Genomic Equity, SSRN 6159546
Cardio endocrinology and metabolic medicineClinical research program25 year systematic review, Int. J. Cardiovascular Medicine 2024
Clinical AI governance and policyEGLS · AIDD-GOVFormal theory on SSRN; open standard under Apache 2.0; ACMG 2027 invited talk
VII.

Technology in use

The research stack.

Chosen for reproducibility and local first operation. Model providers are interchangeable behind the orchestration gateway; governance does not depend on any single vendor.

Languages

Python · TypeScript · SQL

Learning and chemistry

PyTorch · scikit-learn · RDKit · REINVENT4 · Boltz

Language models

Anthropic · OpenAI · Ollama (local first) · cost aware routing via MedClaw

Application layer

Next.js · FastAPI · Supabase and PostgreSQL · Clerk · Vercel · Docker

Interoperability

HL7 FHIR · ES256 JWT · REST

Governance tooling

AIDD-GOV schemas · governance ledger (SOGDR) · Watcher Protocol · Crossref verified citation engine

VIII.

Operating principles

Six commitments, enforced in code.

Each principle corresponds to a mechanism in the build, not to a statement of intent.

01

Clinician directed

Every platform is directed, audited, and clinically reviewed by a practicing board certified physician. Clinical review is a named stage gate.

02

Governance as viability constraint

Adaptive computation is permitted only inside declared bounds. The bound is enforced by a ledger and a watcher, not by policy text.

03

Generation separated from evaluation

The agent that produces an output never grades it. Critic actor separation is a contract, tested in the suite.

04

Evidence verified at source

Citations resolve through Crossref before acceptance. Degraded metadata is rejected. Nothing is transcribed by hand.

05

Audit trail by default

Per agent telemetry, stage gate decisions, and kill switch state are logged for post hoc review and regression detection.

06

Open standards where possible

AIDD-GOV is published under Apache 2.0 with formal schemas and conformance levels so the governance pattern can be audited and reused.

IX.

Scope and status

Common questions.

What does FxMEDUS build?

Governed artificial intelligence platforms for drug discovery, licensure preparation, and clinical operations, each one a research instantiation of the firm's program on externally governed learning systems. Five products and three US provisional patents are on record.

What is the firm's current phase?

Pre seed research and development. Two platforms operate in production as research instantiations, one is in beta, and two are in earlier phases. The emphasis is on validated proof of concept, peer reviewed audit, and published methods.

Does the firm build the platform layer as well as the models?

Yes. FxMED OS is an electronic health record and physician operating system with nineteen service layers; MedBoardPRO and the AFMI Platform are learning platforms; the delivery, cloud, and data engineering underneath are built in house. The AI capability domains and the platform domains share one governance framework.

How are the systems governed?

Through the EGLS framework: a governance declaration names each agent's authority boundary, a ledger records release decisions, a watcher audits runtime behaviour against the declaration, and stage gates with kill switch protocols control release. The pattern is published as the AIDD-GOV open standard.

How is accuracy, bias, and compliance addressed?

By empirical audit rather than assertion. The firm's peer reviewed work on shortcut learning shows how misclassification evades standard validation; the platforms carry that audit into deployment with per agent telemetry and regression detection. Protected health information is handled only under an executed business associate agreement.

Which language models and frameworks are used?

Anthropic, OpenAI, and local inference through Ollama, routed by cost and sensitivity behind the MedClaw gateway. PyTorch, scikit-learn, RDKit, REINVENT4, and Boltz on the learning and chemistry side. Next.js, FastAPI, Supabase, and HL7 FHIR at the application and interoperability layer.

Where is the evidence?

On the Publications page: 31 papers on SSRN, 27 DOIs across platforms, peer reviewed articles in JAMIA Open and Am J Biomed Sci & Res, and an ORCID record with seventy verified peer reviews.

How does correspondence work?

Scientific, editorial, and press correspondence is reviewed within one business day. Identify the journal, institution, or outlet in the subject line. Physicians and principal investigators receive direct founder contact.

X.

Correspondence

For research, editorial, and press.

The firm welcomes scientific and academic correspondence on any of the domains above, editorial inquiries, and press requests. Identify the institution or outlet in the subject line.

Open the contact form